Investigating the Role of the Flexible Physical Classroom Environment in Enhancing Students’ Learning and Creativity Based on Gibson’s Affordance Theory

Authors

    Zahra Alinia Department of Architecture, Sar.C., Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran
    Seyed Ali Seyedian * Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran a_seyedian@umz.ac.ir
    Sara Shareati Department of Architecture, Qa.C., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
    Mehdi Mirzagoltabar Roshan Department of Civil Engineering, Sar.C., Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

Keywords:

Physical¬environment, Classroom, Flexible design, Students’ creativity, Active learning.

Abstract

This study aimed to explain the role of the physical classroom environment and flexible design in enhancing learning and creativity among lower elementary school students based on Gibson’s Affordance Theory. This study used a mixed-methods quantitative–qualitative approach with a concurrent exploratory design. The statistical population included first-grade elementary students, teachers, and parents in Sari during the 2024–2025 academic year. In the quantitative phase, 120 participants were selected through simple random sampling. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire. The reliability of the instrument was confirmed with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.869. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling in SmartPLS 3.3. The results indicated that the proposed model had satisfactory explanatory power. The coefficient of determination was 0.724 for learning and 0.689 for creativity. Activity-based design had a positive and significant effect on learning (β = 0.473, p < 0.001). Flexible design showed the strongest direct effect on creativity (β = 0.706, p < 0.001). Learning also had a positive and significant effect on creativity (β = 0.469, p < 0.001). The direct effect of activity-based design on creativity was not significant, whereas its indirect effect through learning was confirmed (β = 0.222, p < 0.001). The findings show that physical flexibility, activity-based organization, and functional diversity in classrooms can enhance students’ active learning and creativity by providing opportunities for action, interaction, movement, and experience. Therefore, revising elementary school design standards based on flexible and human-centered learning environments is essential.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Akbarnejad Touchahi L. The Degree of Alignment of Educational and Training Spaces in Regions with Educational Needs. General Office for Renovation, Development, and Equipment of Schools of Gilan Province, 2013.

2. Lang JT, Moleski W. Functionalism revisited: Architectural theory and practice and the behavioral sciences. Journal of Farnham, Surrey, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate. 2020;2:34-51.

3. Waite S. Teaching and learning outside the classroom: Personal values, alternative pedagogies and standards. Education 3-13. 2011;39(1):65-82. doi: 10.1080/03004270903206313.

4. Zins JE, Payton JW, Weissberg RP, O'Brien MU, Matthews G, Zeidner M, et al. Social and emotional learning for successful school performance. The Science of Emotional Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns2017. p. 376-95.

5. Sadeghi E, Sadeghi Y, Khadivi H. The Effect of School Environment Design with a Nature-Oriented Architectural Approach on Student Learning in Izeh City. Green Development Management Studies. 2023;2(1):129-38.

6. Alborzi M, Khoshbakht F, Mousavizadeh M. Designing a Physical Aesthetics Model in Educational Spaces and Explaining the Creativity Model of Elementary School Students: A Mixed-Methods Study. Curriculum Research. 2021;11(1):56-76.

7. Soleimani S, Kheiri M. A Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Environmental Features Affecting Children's Creativity in Schools and Educational Centers. Journal of School Administration. 2021;9(2):301-29.

8. Rezakhani Z, Mansouri F, editors. Recognizing the Role of Nature in Elementary Schools and Its Effect on Children's Creativity. Fifth Scientific Research Conference on New Horizons in Geography, Planning, Architecture, and Urban Planning in Iran; 2017; Tehran.

9. Gholamzadeh A. Application of Biophilic Architecture in the Design of Educational Environments to Enhance Naturalistic Intelligence Based on Gardner's Theory. Applied Research in Technical and Engineering Sciences. 2023;8(32).

10. Rajabipour F, Delshad Siahkali M. An Inquiry into Responsiveness to the Emergence of Social Competence in Adolescents' Learning Environments Influenced by Types of Design Experiences in a Biophilic Approach. Educational Technology. 2020;14(3):723-38.

11. Mirza Goltabar Roshan M, Alinia Z, editors. The Effect of the Relationship between Indoor and Outdoor Spaces in Elementary School Design on Improving Learning and Development Quality for Children Aged 7 to 122023.

12. Samadpour Shahrak M, Tahbaz M. Investigating Strategies for Improving Open Spaces in Girls' Elementary Schools from Students' Perspectives: A Case Study of Tabriz City. Educational Technology. 2021;12(2):95-108.

13. Mills M. Developing environments for research engagement in schools. Educational Research Review. 2025.

14. Li Z, Xie S, Chen W. The Influence of Environment on Adolescents’ Physical Exercise Behavior Based on Family Community and School Micro-Systems. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91387-0.

15. Kanchan M. The attitude-anxiety relationship: Influences of family, peer group, and school environment. Naveen International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 2025;1(4).

16. Hidayati S, Siswanto S, Walid M, Hoque O. Assessing the Influence of Digital Expertise, Social Environment and Leader Trust on Pai Teacher Achievements as a Strategic Asset of School Excellence. Edupedia Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Dan Pedagogi Islam. 2025;9(2):142-52. doi: 10.35316/edupedia.v9i2.5991.

17. Rode JC, Mooney CH, Arthaud-Day ML, Near JP, Rubin RS, Baldwin TT, et al. An examination of the structural, discriminant, nomological, and incremental predictive validity of the MSCEIT V2.0. Intelligence. 2018;36(4):350-66. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2007.07.002.

18. Haryadi RN. Challenges and Opportunities in Adopting Heutagogy in Formal School Environments. Ijss. 2025;1(1):40-6. doi: 10.51805/ijss.v1i1.314.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-23

Submitted

2026-01-18

Revised

2026-05-13

Accepted

2026-05-20

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Alinia, Z. ., Seyedian, S. A., Shareati, S., & Mirzagoltabar Roshan, M. . (1405). Investigating the Role of the Flexible Physical Classroom Environment in Enhancing Students’ Learning and Creativity Based on Gibson’s Affordance Theory. Journal of Study and Innovation in Education and Development, 1-22. https://jsied.org/index.php/jsied/article/view/510

Similar Articles

1-10 of 219

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.