Rethinking the Concept of Moral Development in Generation Alpha in the Digital Age: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Challenges and Educational Implications

Authors

Keywords:

Moral Development, Generation Alpha, Moral Agency, Philosophy of Moral Education, Digital Age, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This study aimed to reconceptualize moral development among Generation Alpha in the digital age, with particular emphasis on moral agency, the moral self, the moral other, and educational context from the perspective of contemporary philosophy of moral education. This systematic review adopted a descriptive–interpretive approach. Systematic searches were conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PhilPapers, ERIC, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Iranian databases for studies published between 2010 and 2026. Of 166 initially identified records, 14 studies were retained for final analysis following duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, full-text assessment, and application of predefined eligibility criteria according to PRISMA guidelines. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two researchers using a researcher-developed checklist, JBI tools, and CASP, with excellent inter-rater agreement. The evidence was integrated through a four-stage narrative synthesis involving framework development, pattern identification, assessment of robustness, and construction of an analytical narrative. The synthesis indicated that Generation Alpha's digital lifeworld fundamentally challenges classical assumptions of moral development across four interrelated domains. Moral agency is shifting from individual autonomy toward distributed and hybrid forms in which human decision-making increasingly interacts with algorithmic mediation. The moral self is constructed through continuous engagement with algorithmically curated content and platform norms, while the capacity for moral responsibility remains evident. The category of the moral “other” has expanded to encompass artificial entities; nevertheless, authentic empathy and reciprocal moral relationships remain dependent on meaningful human encounters. Furthermore, the educational context has expanded beyond family and school into algorithmically structured environments, requiring educators to move from transmitting predetermined values toward functioning as critical facilitators who cultivate moral-digital literacy and reflective engagement with technology. Classical paradigms of moral development are insufficient as stand-alone frameworks for explaining the formation of moral agency and identity among Generation Alpha in digitally mediated environments. A revised conceptual framework emphasizing hybrid agency, fluid moral identity, an expanded conception of the other, and an algorithmic-educational context may provide a more appropriate foundation for moral education, curriculum development, and educational policymaking in the digital age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kohlberg L. Essays on Moral Development, Vol. 2: The Psychology of Moral Development: Harper & Row; 1984.

2. Gilligan C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development: Harvard University Press; 1993.

3. Noddings N. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education: University of California Press; 1984.

4. MacIntyre A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory: University of Notre Dame Press; 1981.

5. Hildebrand DL. John Dewey. The Routledge Companion to Pragmatism: Routledge; 2022. p. 26-34.

6. Jamshidi M. Levinas and the Infinite: A Phenomenology of Ethical Experience. Existence and Knowledge. 2016;3(1):11-97.

7. Rafiei B. An Introduction to Moral Education in Islam: Research Institute of Hawzah and University; 2016.

8. Bagheri K. A Reconsideration of Islamic Education: Confronting Theoretical and Practical Challenges. 15th ed: SAMT (Organization for Researching and Composing University Textbooks in the Humanities); 2019.

9. Latifi A. Philosophical Foundations of Islamic Education: Research Institute of Hawzah and University; 2023.

10. Verbeek PP. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design: Penn State Press; 2005.

11. Burbules NC, Callister TA. Watch IT: The Promises and Risks of Information Technologies for Education. Boulder: Westview Press; 2000.

12. Mittelstadt BD, Allo P, Taddeo M, Wachter S, Floridi L. The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate. Big Data & Society. 2016;3(2):1-21.

13. McCrindle M. Generation Alpha: Hachette UK; 2021.

14. McCrindle M, Fell A. Generation Alpha: Understanding Our Children and Helping Them Thrive: Hachette Australia; 2021.

15. Jha AK. Understanding Generation Alpha. PsyArXiv Preprints2020.

16. Spasova D. Generation Alpha and the Education. Science Business Society. 2022;7(2):75-8.

17. Höfrová A, Balidemaj V, Small MA. A Systematic Literature Review of Education for Generation Alpha. Discover Education. 2024;3(1):125.

18. Green L, Holloway D, Stevenson K, Leaver T, Haddon L. Children’s Moral Agency in the Digital Environment. The Routledge Companion to Digital Media and Children: Routledge; 2021. p. 368-77.

19. Arroyo-Almaraz I, Gómez-Díaz R. The Undesired Effects of Digital Communication on Moral Response. Comunicar. 2015;22(44):149-58.

20. Tok AY, Powell NL, Guellaï B. A Systematic Review of Moral Agency in Artificial Agents. Discover Psychology. 2025;6(1):9.

21. Zhou J, Corbett F, Byun J, Porat T, van Zalk N. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological and Behavioural Responses in Human-Agent vs. Human-Human Interactions. Communications Psychology. 2026;4(1):102. doi: 10.1038/s44271-026-00466-z.

22. Khalid A, Hassan TU, Shabir G. Cultivation Effects of Social Media on Cognitive, Social and Moral Skills of Adolescents in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies. 2020;6(2):419-36.

23. Leonardo O, Quimson J. #LIKEORUNLIKE: A Descriptive Study on the Effects of Social Media on the Moral Development of the Young People. International Journal of Research Studies in Education. 2020.

24. Twenge JM, Campbell WK. Associations between Screen Time and Lower Psychological Well-Being among Children and Adolescents: Evidence from a Population-Based Study. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2018;12:271-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003.

25. O’Reilly M, Levine D, Law E. Applying a ‘Digital Ethics of Care’ Philosophy to Understand Adolescents’ Sense of Responsibility on Social Media. Pastoral Care in Education. 2021;39(2):91-107.

26. O’Reilly M, Levine D, Batchelor R, Adams S. Digital Ethics of Care and Digital Citizenship in UK Primary Schools: Children as Interviewers. Journal of Children and Media. 2024;18(4):585-604.

27. Pariser E. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You: Penguin UK; 2011.

28. Constantinescu M, Uszkai R, Vică C, Voinea C. Children-Robot Friendship, Moral Agency, and Aristotelian Virtue Development. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2022;9:818489. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.818489.

29. Yu E, Burns S, Wiebe JP, Schmeichel A, Perlman M. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Early Childhood Development: A Scoping Review Protocol. BMJ Open. 2025;15(11):e106044. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106044.

30. Harrison T, Polizzi G. (In)civility and Adolescents’ Moral Decision Making Online: Drawing on Moral Theory to Advance Digital Citizenship Education. Education and Information Technologies. 2021;27:3277-97.

31. Yulia R, Henita N, Gustiawan R, Erita Y. Efforts to Strengthen Character Education for Elementary School Students by Utilizing Digital Literacy in Era 4.0. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education. 2022;1(6):240-9.

32. Hagendorff T. The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines. Minds and Machines. 2020;30(1):99-120.

33. Hagendorff T. A Virtue-Based Framework to Support Putting AI Ethics into Practice. Philosophy & Technology. 2022;35(3):55.

34. Zakaei MS. Digital Adolescents: Reshaping Adolescence in Iran. Cultural and Social Studies of Children and Adolescents. 2025;3(1):37-63.

35. Alipour F. Educational and Professional Challenges and Opportunities in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Requirements and Implications for Schools. Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. 2024;0(18):277-88.

36. Tavakoli M, Golmohammadi J. Assessing the Capacities and Ethical Challenges of Applying Artificial Intelligence in the Moral Education Process of Students. Ethics Research Journal. 2025;18(69):9-26.

37. Livingstone S, Haddon L. Children, Risk and Safety on the Internet: Research and Policy Challenges in Comparative Perspective: Policy Press; 2012.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Asadi, P., Hosseinimehr, A., & Rahmani, O. (1406). Rethinking the Concept of Moral Development in Generation Alpha in the Digital Age: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Challenges and Educational Implications. Journal of Study and Innovation in Education and Development, 1-30. https://jsied.org/index.php/jsied/article/view/644