Validation and Prioritization of the Dimensions and Components of the Academic Progress Assessment Model for Primary School Students in E-Learning Programs (Shad)

Authors

    Maryam Hoseinpoor PhD student, Department of Educational Management, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
    Batoul Faghiharam * Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran Faghiharam1388@gmail.com
    Nahid Shafiee Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
    Esfandiar Doshman Ziari Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
    Zohreh Esmaelzade Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy of Education, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
https://doi.org/10.61838/jsied.4.5.7

Keywords:

academic progress assessment model, virtual education, prioritization of dimensions, progress components, Shad network

Abstract

The present study aimed to validate and prioritize the dimensions and components of the academic progress assessment model for primary school students in e-learning programs (Shad) using a mixed-methods approach (qualitative-quantitative). The study was applied in terms of its objective and descriptive-survey in terms of its type. The statistical population consisted of university professors, school principals, experts, and primary school teachers. A purposive sampling method was used to select 25 participants for the qualitative phase, with the sample size determined based on the theoretical saturation of the data. A random cluster sampling technique was employed for the quantitative phase, with 240 participants selected. The data collection tools for the qualitative phase included semi-structured interviews, and for the quantitative phase, a researcher-made questionnaire was used. The qualitative data were analyzed through a three-stage coding process, and the quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. After analyzing the data, five main categories, 18 subcategories, and 70 key indicators of the model’s essential components were identified. To prioritize the dimensions and components of the model, the Friedman test was used, while construct validity, composite reliability (CR), Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) index were employed to evaluate and fit the model. Given that the SRMR index was less than 0.08, it can be concluded that the model fits well. The results of the quantitative phase confirmed the findings from the qualitative phase.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi Kasani H, Shams Moorkani G, Seraji F, Rezai Zadeh M. Tools for Evaluating Learners in E-Learning

Environments. Technology Growth Quarterly. 2019;27(31):39-50.

Jaakkola T, Veermans K. Exploring the effects of concreteness fading across grades in elementary school science

education. Instructional Science. 2017:1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11251-017-9428-y.

Gitomer DH. Measurement issues and Assessment for Teaching Quality. Los: [Publisher Missing]; 2009.

Neuman L. Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: Allyn & Bacon; 2007.

Pavri S. Effective Assessment of Students; Determining Responsiveness to Instruction. Upper Saddle River, New

Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2012.

Sindelar NW. Assessment-powered teaching: Corwin, a Sage Company; 2011.

Luka I. Summative evaluation of online language learning course efficiency for students studying tourism and

hospitality management. Quality Assurance in Education. 2018;26(4):446-65. doi: 10.1108/QAE-04-2018-0051.

Garrison DR, Anderson T. E-Learning in the 21st Century. Zarai Z, Safaie M, editors. Tehran: Science and Technology

Publishing; 2005.

Garrison DR, Anderson T. E-Learning in the 21st Century. British Journal of Education Technology. 2012;38(4):755.

Zarai M, Zarai Zowarki E, Aliabadi K, Dalavar A. Design and Validation of a Social Network Model for Schools in

Iran. Journal of Educational Technology. 2019;13(2).

Zarai Zowarki E. Theoretical and Scientific Foundations of Internet Applications in Teaching and Learning Processes.

Tehran: Avaye Noor; 2013.

Terbati Nejad H, Kaviar A, Ghandizadeh M. Predicting Academic Achievement Based on Achievement Motivation

and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in High School Girls. Quest in Educational Sciences and Counseling. 2022;8(16):24-

Beigi N, Rezazadeh Bahadoran H, Khosravi Babadi A-A, Pooshneh K. Design and Field Validation of an

Implementation Model for Academic Progress Evaluation in Elementary Schools. Curriculum Studies. 2021;16(62):83-110.

Bit Siyah F. Investigating Factors Affecting Academic Achievement in Secondary Education. Journal of

Psychological and Educational Sciences Studies. 2021(7):280-9.

Hojati SA, Yarahmadian MH, Kashti-Aray M. Designing a Suitable Academic Progress Evaluation Model for

Technical and Engineering Fields Based on the Lived Experiences of Professors and Students. 2017;8(2):321-38.

Yang C. Exploring the Possibilities of Online Learning Experiences2020.

Azizi N, Heidari S. Elementary Teachers' Attitudes Towards Descriptive Evaluation in Sanandaj City. Educational

Sciences (Educational and Psychological Sciences). 2012;6(2):0-.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-20

Submitted

2024-12-18

Revised

2025-01-11

Accepted

2025-01-25

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Hoseinpoor , M., Faghiharam , B. ., Shafiee , N. ., Doshman Ziari , E. ., & Esmaelzade , Z. . (2025). Validation and Prioritization of the Dimensions and Components of the Academic Progress Assessment Model for Primary School Students in E-Learning Programs (Shad). Journal of Study and Innovation in Education and Development, 4(5), 120-138. https://doi.org/10.61838/jsied.4.5.7

Similar Articles

1-10 of 187

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.