Identifying the Dimensions and Components of a Systems Thinking Curriculum with a Heutagogical Approach in Lower Secondary Education

Authors

    Maysam Haji Manochehri PhD Student, Department of Curriculum Planning, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran.
    Nahid Shafiee * Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran. Dr.n.shafiee@gmail.com
    Amirhossein Mehdizadeh Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran.
    Alireza Araghieh Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran.
https://doi.org/10.61838/jsied.4.5.16

Keywords:

Identifying curriculum dimensions, system thinking, first year of high school, hyutagogy

Abstract

Given the crucial role of curriculum in the success of educational systems, the integration of new cognitive approaches in curriculum design should be considered. Accordingly, the present study aimed to identify the dimensions and components of a systems thinking curriculum with a heutagogical approach in lower secondary education. This study is applied in terms of purpose and qualitative in terms of implementation. The research population included eight experts and university faculty members specializing in curriculum planning and educational psychology, who were selected through purposive and snowball sampling methods based on the principle of theoretical saturation. Thematic analysis using a theme network approach was employed to analyze the data. The findings of the study indicated that for designing a systems thinking curriculum model with a heutagogical approach in lower secondary education, within the overarching theme of curriculum, 26 basic themes were categorized under seven organizing themes: structural reform, process management, modern education, promotion of research, utilization of technology, foresight, and understanding complexity. In the overarching theme of implementation requirements, 15 basic themes were classified under five organizing themes: structural, legal, functional, systemic comprehensiveness in macro design, and understanding dimensions and relationships in educational processes. Furthermore, in the overarching theme of implementation effects, 23 basic themes were identified under eight organizing themes: enhancement of students' academic capabilities, development of students' social competencies, improvement of students' psychological competencies, advancement of students' various thinking skills, understanding systemic relationships and modeling, adaptability and comprehension of complex environments, flexibility, and enhancement of teachers' teaching competencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bezi A, Fakoori H, Bayani AA, Saemi H. Design and Validation of an Environmental Education Curriculum Model

for Higher Education Based on the "Aker" Approach. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 2024;7(1):79-90. doi:

61838/kman.ijes.7.1.8.

Song Q. Applying Design Thinking in Ecotourism Curriculum Design: The Educational Design Ladder. Open Journal

of Applied Sciences. 2024;14(06):1454-63. doi: 10.4236/ojapps.2024.146096.

Bansal S, Sherif YA, Nuchtern JG, Rosengart TK, Davis RW. A comprehensive curriculum for the American

academic global surgery trainee: Addressing an educational need. The American Journal of Surgery. 2023;226(5):721-5. doi:

1016/j.amjsurg.2023.06.016.

Yusuf M, Samsura DAA, Yuwono PSH. Toward a framework for an undergraduate academic tourism curriculum in

Indonesian Universities: Some perspectives from stakeholders. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education.

;22:63-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlste.2018.02.003.

Kit JA, Fell A. A social-constructivist approach to learning enhanced by technology. Qualitative Education Research.

;11(1):47-58.

Shafii N, editor Self-Determination Curriculum from the Heutagogical Approach Perspective. Fifth International

Conference on Psychology, Educational Sciences, and Lifestyle; 2018.

Shafii N, editor The Position of Teaching Individual Systemic Thinking in Future Schools. Second National

Conference on Future School; 2021.

Jain AB, Sharma L, Sharma N, Jain C, Madaan M. Students' Perception Regarding Pedagogy, Andragogy, and

Heutagogy as Teaching-Learning Methods in Undergraduate Medical Education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion.

;9:1-7. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_221_20.

Hase S. An Introduction to Self-Determined Learning (Heutagogy). In: Blaschke LM, Kenyon C, editors. Experiences

in Self-Determined Learning: Amazon; 2014. p. 1-19.

Hase S, Kenyon C. The nature of learning. In: Hase S, Kenyon C, editors. Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in

action: Bloomsbury; 2013. p. 19-38.

Hainsworth N, Dowse E, Cummins A, Ebert L, Foureur M. Heutagogy: A self-determined learning approach for

midwifery continuity of care experiences. Nurse Education in Practice. 2022;60:103329. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103329.

Lynch M, Sage T, Hitchcock LI, Sage M. A heutagogical approach for the assessment of Internet Communication

Technology (ICT) assignments in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

;18(55):1-16. doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00290-x.

Wehmeyer ML, Shogren KA, Toste JR, Mahal S. Self-Determined Learning to Motivate Struggling Learners in

Reading and Writing. Intervention in School and Clinic. 2017;52(5):295-303. doi: 10.1177/1053451216676800.

Handayani SM, Yeigh T, Jacka L, Peddell L. Developing a heutagogy approach to promoting teacher competencies

in Indonesia. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 2021;16(3):939-51. doi: 10.18844/cjes.v16i3.5765.

Mirowski P. From Mandelbrot to chaos in economic theory. Southern Economic Journal. 1990;57(2):289-307. doi:

2307/1060611.

Davis B, Sumara D. Complexity as a theory of education. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry. 2008;5(2).

Assaraf OBZ, Orion N. Systems thinking skills at the elementary school level. Journal of Research in Science

Teaching. 2010;47(5):540-63. doi: 10.1002/tea.20351.

Jaiswal A, Karabiyik T. Characterizing Undergraduate Students' Systems-Thinking Skills through Agent-Based

Modeling Simulation. Sustainability. 2022;14(19):12817. doi: 10.3390/su141912817.

Shaked H, Schechter C. Systems Thinking for Principals of Learning-Focused Schools. Journal of School

Administration Research and Development. 2019;4(1):18-23. doi: 10.32674/jsard.v4i1.1939.

Badurdeen F, Gregory R, Luhan GA, Schroeder M, Vincent LV, Sekulic DP. Systems Thinking for Sustainability:

Envisioning Trans-disciplinary Transformations in STEM Education. Learning. 2012;11:12.

Lally D, Forbes C, editors. Not Specified. School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; 2020.

Bosch O, Nguyen N, Sun D. Addressing the critical need for a "new way of thinking" in dealing with complex issues

facing our societies. Business Systems Review. 2013;2:48-70.

Plate R. Assessing individuals' understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems. System Dynamics

Review. 2010;26(1):19-33. doi: 10.1002/sdr.432.

Bogler R, Nir AE. The contribution of perceived fit between job demands and abilities to teachers' commitment and

job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2015;43(4):541-60. doi:

1177/1741143214535736.

Aghajani Z. Teaching Systemic Thinking in Secondary School, Teacher's Educational, Analytical, and Informative

Monthly (Special Issue for 12th Grade). Not Specified. 2018.

Dyehouse M, Bennett D, Harbor J, Childress A, Dark M. A comparison of linear and systems thinking approaches for

program evaluation illustrated using the Indiana Interdisciplinary GK-12. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2009;32(3):187-

doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.03.001.

Zoller U. Environmental education and the university: The 'problem solving-decision making act' within a critical

system-thinking framework. Higher Education in Europe. 1990;15:5-14. doi: 10.1080/0379772900150402.

Nikmohammadi Z, Shafii N, Arakiyeh A. Identifying the Dimensions and Components of Heutagogical Curriculum

in Secondary Education. Sociology of Education. 2023;9(2):275-86.

Habibi Asl P. Examining Solutions for Developing the Professional Knowledge of Part-Time Teachers in Bahmai

County Based on Heutagogical, Synergistic, Andragogical, and Pedagogical Approaches: Shiraz Payam Noor University; 2021.

Abili K, Mazari E. Providing a Self-Development Heutagogical Model in an Electronic Context (A Model for Leading

Learning). Digital Journal, Digital Transformation Encyclopedia. 2021;2(1):17-1.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-20

Submitted

2025-01-17

Revised

2025-02-17

Accepted

2025-02-27

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Haji Manochehri, M. ., Shafiee, N., Mehdizadeh, A. ., & Araghieh, A. . (2025). Identifying the Dimensions and Components of a Systems Thinking Curriculum with a Heutagogical Approach in Lower Secondary Education. Journal of Study and Innovation in Education and Development, 4(5), 300-314. https://doi.org/10.61838/jsied.4.5.16

Similar Articles

1-10 of 153

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.