طراحی و اعتباربخشی الگوی برنامه درسی تلفیقی آموزش طبیعت‌گرایانه و دیجیتال در دوره اول ابتدایی

1. Unesco. The Global State of Outdoor Education: Addressing the Nature-Deficit in a Post-Pandemic World: UNESCO Publishing; 2024.

2. Williamson B. Digital education governance: An introduction. European Educational Research Journal. 2016;15(1):3-13.

3. McCree M, Cutting R, Sherwin D. The Hare and the Tortoise go to Forest School: taking the scenic route to academic attainment via emotional wellbeing outdoors. Early Child Development and Care. 2018;188(7):980-96. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2018.1446430.

4. Harris F. The nature of learning at forest school: practitioners' perspectives. Education 3-13. 2015;45(2):272-91. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2015.1078833.

5. Becker C, Lauterbach G, Spengler S, Dettweiler U, Mess F. Effects of regular classes in outdoor education settings: A systematic review on students' learning, social and health dimensions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14(5):485. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14050485.

6. Finch K. Developing a nature-based curriculum for preschool aged children: State University of New York at Fredonia; 2014.

7. Snyder PA, Rakap S, Hemmeter ML, McLaughlin TW, Sandall S, McLean ME. Naturalistic instructional approaches in early learning: A systematic review. Journal of Early Intervention. 2015;37(1):69-97.

8. Avari S, Hosseinikhah A, Asgari M. Explanation and analysis of learning elements and the status of children and facilitators in nature schools. Scientific Quarterly of School Administration. 2019;6(1).

9. Morrison GS. Early childhood education today. 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 2001.

10. Edwards CP, Gandini L, Forman G. The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach - advanced reflections. 2nd ed. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Corp; 1998.

11. Hairit A. E-Learning 2025: Personalizing Children's Learning through AI and Virtual Reality. Journal of Islamic Elementary Education. 2025;3(1):291-303. doi: 10.32806/islamentary.v3i1.821.

12. Soroka V. Digital Education in the International Pedagogical Discourse. Comparative Professional Pedagogy. 2019;9(4):74-81. doi: 10.2478/rpp-2019-0040.

13. Ilomäki L, Lakkala M. Digital technology and practices for school improvement: innovative digital school model. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. 2018;13:1-32. doi: 10.3390/fi13020032.

14. Means B. Technology and education change: Focus on student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2010;42(3):285-307. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782552.

15. Kadiyala M, Crynes BL. A review of literature on effectiveness of use of information technology in education. Journal of Engineering Education. 2000;89(2):177-89.

16. Christensen R. Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2002;34(4):411-33. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2002.10782359.

17. Brown WH, McIver KL, Pfeiffer KA, Dowda M, Addy CL, Pate RR. Social and environmental factors associated with preschoolers' nonsedentary physical activity. Child Development. 2009;80(1):45-58.

18. Bodnar S, Cucchiarini C, Strik H, van Hout R. Evaluating the motivational impact of CALL systems: Current practices and future directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2016;29(1):186-212.

19. Solani A. Digital Tools in Nature-Based Education: A Synthesis of Hybrid Learning Environments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2022;25(3):112-28.

20. Gençten VY, Aydemir F, Gultekin M. Nature-Based Learning and Digital Competencies in Early Years Education. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi. 2022;12(4):2160-76.

21. Buchanan J, Pressick-Kilborn K, Maher D. Promoting environmental education for primary school-aged students using digital technologies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2018;15(2):em1661.

22. Suhirman S. the Influence of Learning Methods and Naturalist Intelligence on Critical Thinking Skills in Science Learning. Jurnal Tatsqif. 2020;18(1):60-76. doi: 10.20414/jtq.v18i1.2433.

23. Ekanara B, Ramdana A, Leksono SM, Isfiani IR, Safkolam R. Naturalistic Intelligence and Problem-Solving Skills: Study of Its Connectivity Through Environmental Photovoice Projects. Biodidaktika J Biol Pembelajarannya. 2023;18:24-37. doi: 10.30870/biodidaktika.v18i1.18316.

24. Rahim M, Hulukati W, Puluhulawa M, editors. Naturalistic Intelligence and Environmental Sustainability (A Review). The 8th International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2024); 2025: Atlantis Press.

25. Zeng C, Sweet W. Ecological Citizenship In China And The Role Of Social Media. Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy. 2025;26(1).

26. Faridy F, Mirna M, Munawwarah M, Rohendi A, editors. Parenting Strategies for Nurturing Naturalistic Intelligence: Family's Role in Promoting Environmental Awareness. Proceeding International Conference on Religion, Science and Education; 2025.

27. Herber-Valdez CR. The integrated curriculum and student empathy: a longitudinal multi-cohort analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2024;29(4):1131-53.

28. Mills M, Riddle S, McGregor G, Howell A. Towards an understanding of curricular justice and democratic schooling. Journal of Educational Administration and History. 2022;54(3):345-56.

29. Winarno N, Rusdiana D, Susilowati E, Afifah RMA. Implementation of integrated science curriculum: a critical review of the literature. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. 2020;8(2):795-817.

30. Rasool R. Naturalism And Its Relevance In The Contemporary System Of Education. Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy. 2023;1(3):245-9. doi: 10.59733/jishup.v1i3.72.

31. Gautheron O. Teachers' Perceptions of the Effects of Nature-Based Learning on Junior Level. Toronto: Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning, 2014.

32. Zuhri RS, Wilujeng I, Haryanto H, Ibda H. Information communication technologies education in elementary school: a systematic literature review. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn). 2024;18(3):1078-90.

33. Rahmani MN, Mohammadi Chamrani H. Identifying factors affecting the success of e-learning courses (Mixed-methods research). Journal of Educational Sciences. 2019;26(10):137-54.

34. Karunanayaka S, Weerakoon W. Fostering Digital Education among Teachers and Learners in Sri Lankan Schools. Journal of Learning for Development. 2020;7(1):61-77.

35. Nielsen K. Revisiting the Spider Web Model: Curriculum Design for Hybrid and Eco-Digital Learning Environments. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research. 2023;5(2):88-105.

36. Araújo ACD, Knijnik J, Ovens AP. How does physical education and health respond to the growing influence in media and digital technologies? An analysis of curriculum in Brazil, Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2021;53(4):563-77.

37. Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management. 2003;40(3).

38. Teo T. Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education. 2009;52(2):302-12. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006.

39. Kakar AK. How do perceived enjoyment and perceived usefulness of a software product interact over time to impact technology acceptance? Interacting with Computers. 2017;29(4):467-80.

40. Heckel C, Ringeisen T. Pride and anxiety in online learning environments: Achievement emotions as mediators between learners' characteristics and learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2019;35(5):667-77.

41. Seraji F, Khavari S. Technological literacy of students and teachers: An analysis of the difference between two generations. Journal of Contemporary Sociological Research. 2016(9).

42. Topal M, Yıldırım EG, Önder AN. Use of educational films in environmental education as a digital learning object. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health. 2020;6(2):134-47.

43. Poultsakis S, Papadakis S, Kalogiannakis M, Psycharis S. The management of digital learning objects of natural sciences and digital experiment simulation tools by teachers. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research. 2021;1(2):58-71.

44. Lestari T, Sarwi S, Sumarti S. STEM-Based Project Based Learning Model to Increase Science Process and Creative Thinking Skills of 5th Grade. Journal of Primary Education. 2018;7(1):18-24.

45. Putri AF, Artanto D, editors. Bibliometric Analysis: Trends Research in Junior High School Natural Science Learning Based on Local Potential in 2021-2024. Proceeding International Conference on Religion, Science and Education; 2025.

46. Soriano-Sánchez JG. The Impact of ICT on Primary School Students' Natural Science Learning in Support of Diversity: A Meta-Analysis. Education Sciences. 2025;15(6):690.

47. Urbanaviciene D, Geisleris D, editors. Enhancing Primary Education Through Nature And Ai: The Forest School Experience. ICERI2024 Proceedings; 2024: IATED.

48. del Moral Pérez ME, Guzmán Duque AP, Fernández García LC. Game-based learning: Increasing the logical-mathematical, naturalistic, and linguistic learning levels of primary school students. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research. 2018;7(1):31-9.