The Impact of Blended Learning on Student-Teacher Interactions in Higher Education
Keywords:
Flipped Learning, Blended Learning, Academic Outcomes, Student Motivation, Educational TechnologyAbstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of flipped learning and blended learning methods in enhancing academic outcomes. Flipped learning, which reverses traditional classroom roles by delivering instructional content outside of class, allows for deeper in-class engagement through interactive activities. In contrast, blended learning combines traditional face-to-face instruction with online components, offering greater flexibility and access to diverse resources. Through a descriptive analysis of previous studies, the article examines the effectiveness of both methods in improving student performance, motivation, and autonomy. The findings reveal that while both approaches positively impact academic results, their success largely depends on environmental factors such as technological infrastructure and teacher competency. Challenges such as technology access for flipped learning and the need for self-regulation in blended learning are discussed. The study concludes with practical recommendations for effectively implementing these methods in various educational settings.
Downloads
References
زارعی، م. )1396(. بررس ی تأثی ر استفاده از روش یادگیری معکوس بر عملکرد تحصی لی دانش آموزان در درس ریاضیات .
فصلنامه پژوهش های تربیتی ، 27)2(، .30-15
فراهانی، ر. ) 1397(. نقش معلمان در موفق یت ی ادگیری تلفی قی در محیط های آموزش ی ایران. فصلنامه علوم تربیتی ، 16)1(،
.62 -45
نوروزی، ح. )1398(. تأثیر یادگی ر ی تلفیق ی بر ی ادگیری زبان انگلی سی دانش آموزان دبیرستانی . مجله آموزش و پرورش، 10)4(،
.90 -77
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped
classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research &
Development, 34(1), 1-14.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in
Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its
transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education:
Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway
to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1),
-43.
López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended
learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes.
Computers & Education, 56(3), 818-826.
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher
education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational
Technology, 43(6), 51-54.
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation,
innovation, and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193.
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom: Online instruction at home frees class
time for learning. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.