Experiences of Farhangian University Faculty Members Regarding Philosophical Prospects and Challenges in Teacher Education: A Qualitative Study

Authors

    Fatemeh Mardan Arbat * Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 889-14665, Tehran, Iran f.mardan@cfu.ac.ir
    Maryam Marandi Heydarloo Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 889-14665, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

faculty experiences, philosophical challenges, teacher education, philosophy of education

Abstract

Teacher education, as one of the fundamental pillars of the educational system, plays a pivotal role in improving the quality of education and training. At the same time, it faces various philosophical prospects and challenges. The present study aimed to examine the experiences of faculty members at Farhangian University regarding the application of and engagement with philosophical prospects and challenges in the teacher education process. This research employed a qualitative design with an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach. The study population comprised all faculty members of Farhangian University in East Azerbaijan Province, selected through purposive criterion sampling. Sampling continued until data saturation was reached, and ultimately 15 participants took part in the study. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews and analyzed using Smith’s six-stage protocol. The findings led to the extraction of nine main themes: (1) enhancing the teacher education process through philosophical perspectives, (2) aligning philosophical views in teacher education with the practical and real needs of school teaching, (3) the influence of social and cultural transformations on the philosophy of teacher education, (4) the role of technology and innovation in teacher education from a philosophical standpoint, (5) the importance of critical thinking and philosophy in teacher education, (6) philosophical evaluation of teacher education curricula, (7) the role of philosophical research in developing teacher education, (8) interaction between educational philosophies and educational policies, and (9) philosophical challenges in teacher education: barriers and solutions. Based on these findings, strengthening critical thinking, leveraging technological innovations, and fostering philosophical responsibility among teachers are of great significance. The results indicate that employing philosophical perspectives can improve the teacher education process and enhance the overall quality of education within the national educational system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Fatemeh Mardan Arbat, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 889-14665, Tehran, Iran

    استادیار دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران

References

Shabani Varaki B, Motallebzadeh K, Rahimi M. Teacher education in Iran: Challenges and future directions. Asian Journal of Teacher Education and Development. 2022;10(2):45-63. doi: 10.22034/4.2.1.

Sohbat Lu A, Abedi A. Analysis of the philosophical foundations of teacher education in the Islamic Republic of Iran in the intellectual system of the Imams of the Revolution. Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. 2024;10(Special Issue):1-16. doi: 10.48310/itt.2024.16246.910.

Varaki BS, Qamsari AS, Sefidkhosh M, Sajjadi SM, Chaboki RM, Kalatehjafarabadi TJ, et al. Philosophy of education in a new key: Reflection on higher education in Iran. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2022;54(8):1198-215. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2021.1905517.

Pham Thi K. The relevance of John Dewey's pragmatism for educational innovation in contemporary Vietnam. Cogent Education. 2025;12(1). doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2510055.

Kumari S. Humanism in Education: Fostering Student-Centered Learning Through Maslow's and Rogers' Theories. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. 2024;5(7):2447-52. doi: 10.55248/gengpi.5.0724.1911.

Chand SP. Constructivism in education: Exploring the contributions of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. International Journal of Scientific Research. 2023;13(2):89-102. doi: 10.21275/SR23630021800.

Faqdi M, Mahmoudnia A, Barkhordari R, Ghaedi Y. Philosophical explanation of dramaturgy as an educational approach in formal education: examining the roles and providing suggestions for improving the teacher education system. Technology and Knowledge Research in Education. 2024;4(1):101-15. doi: 10.30473/t-edu.2024.72345.1193.

Alavi SY, Rezvani R, Yazdani S. A Gap Analysis between EFL Teachers' Assessment Literacy in Iranian Public Schools and Their Pre-service Assessment Curriculum. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills). 2022;41(4):59-86. doi: 10.22099/tesl.2022.42432.3066.

Mohammadinejad IM, editor The role of modern educational technologies in improving the teaching process and increasing learning interactions in the classroom. First International Conference on Strategies for Training Research Teachers in Education; 2025; Ahvaz.

Nieto S. Re-imagining multicultural education: New visions, new possibilities. Multicultural Education Review. 2016;9(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/2005615X.2016.1276671.

Esmaeili M, Rahmati S, Bani-Eqbal A, editors. Studying the impact of multicultural education programs on reducing discrimination and increasing educational justice among students. Second National Conference on Humanities with a New Approach and First International Research Conference on Modern Educators; 2025; Astara.

Paris D, Alim HS. Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2017.

Nazari M, De Costa PI, Karimpour S. The role of institutional policy in English language teacher autonomy, agency, and identity: A poststructural perspective. Language Teaching Research. 2023. doi: 10.1177/13621688221143476.

Muniz J. Culturally Responsive Teaching: A Reflection Guide: New Republic; 2020.

Petko D, Mishra P, Koehler M. TPACK in context: An updated model. Computers and Education Open. 2025;8:100244. doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100244.

Rombout F. Teaching value-loaded critical thinking in philosophy education. Journal of Didactics of Philosophy. 2024;2024(8). doi: 10.46586/JDPh.2024.11318.

Abrami PC, Bernard RM, Borokhovski E, Waddington DI, Wade CA, Persson T. Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. 2015;85:275-314. doi: 10.3102/0034654314551063.

Brookfield SD. Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions: Jossey-Bass; 2012.

Zarei S, Derakhshandeh M. Analysis of the role of problem-based learning in developing critical thinking skills of secondary school students. Journal of Cognition, Behavior, Learning. 2024;1(2):181-71. doi: 10.61838/jcbl.1.2.11.

Eatough V, Smith JA. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In: Willig C, Stainton-Rogers W, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology: SAGE; 2017. p. 193-211.

Tajeddin Z. Torn between socio-political mandates and professional identity: Teachers' collaborative reflection on their identity tensions. Language Teaching Research. 2023. doi: 10.1177/13621688231213602.

Khairani F, Handayani T, Effendi D, Puspita Y. The role of educational philosophy as the foundation for teacher strengthening in schools. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme. 2023;6(2):226-35. doi: 10.31851/esteem.v6i2.12319.

Ball SJ. Education, justice, and democracy: Philosophical perspectives on policy and practice: Springer; 2013.

Pietkiewicz I, Smith JA. A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal (Czasopismo Psychologiczne). 2014;20(1):7-14. doi: 10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7.

Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2017;16:1-13. doi: 10.1177/1609406917733847.

Baldan Babayiğit B, Sever D, ÇAm AktaŞ B, KİP KayabaŞ B, ŞEnel EA, GÜVen M. Professional Development for Multicultural Education: Lessons from a Blended In-Service Teacher Training Programme. TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION. 2025;165. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2025.105151.

Kahrizi P, Faghiharam B, Sadeghi A, Mehdizadeh AH, Shabani H. Designing a Multicultural Teaching Model for Professors of Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah. Sociology of Education. 2022;7(1):73-87.

Alemdar M, Aytaç A. The impact of teachers' educational philosophy tendencies on their curriculum autonomy. Journal of Pedagogical Research. 2022;6(1):270-84. doi: 10.33902/JPR.2022.166.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22

Submitted

2024-11-26

Revised

2025-09-21

Accepted

2025-09-26

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Mardan Arbat, F. ., & Marandi Heydarloo, M. . (1405). Experiences of Farhangian University Faculty Members Regarding Philosophical Prospects and Challenges in Teacher Education: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Study and Innovation in Education and Development, 1-28. https://jsied.org/index.php/jsied/article/view/137

Similar Articles

1-10 of 187

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.