Designing a Professional Development Model for Elementary School Principals with an Emphasis on the Heutagogy Approach

Authors

    Fatemeh Ehsani PhD Student, Department of Educational Management, Ga.C., Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran
    Hamid Shafizadeh * Department of Educational Management, Ga.C., Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran. hshafizadeh@iau-garmsar.ac.ir
    Fakhreddin Ahmadi Department of Educational Management, Ga.C., Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.

Keywords:

Professional Development, Elementary School Principals, Heutagogy, Self-Directed Learning, Educational Leadership, Grounded Theory

Abstract

This study aimed to design and explain a professional development model for elementary school principals based on the heutagogy approach and to identify its key dimensions, components, and indicators. This applied qualitative study employed a systematic grounded theory approach. Participants consisted of 18 experts, including university faculty members, senior educational administrators, and specialists in elementary education, selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding based on the Strauss and Corbin paradigm model. Trustworthiness was established through Lincoln and Guba’s criteria of credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability. In addition, a two-round Delphi process was conducted to validate the conceptual model. Data analysis generated 346 initial codes that were refined into 118 indicators, 25 components, and 6 major dimensions. The core phenomenon was identified as principals’ self-directed, experience-based, and reflective professional learning. Causal conditions included the inefficiency of traditional professional development programs, misalignment between managerial training and school realities, centralized educational systems, the complexity of school leadership, and the dynamic nature of educational environments. Contextual conditions encompassed professional learning culture, organizational characteristics of schools, educational policies, and organizational support. Intervening conditions consisted of learning technologies, principals’ motivation, and time and workload constraints. Key strategies included active knowledge seeking, purposeful use of technology, reflective practice, professional networking, and collaborative learning. The model’s consequences involved professional empowerment, enhanced managerial decision-making, development of a learning culture, increased innovation, and improved student learning outcomes. Delphi validation confirmed that all 118 indicators exceeded the critical content validity ratio threshold, supporting the model’s theoretical validity and conceptual coherence. The findings indicate that effective professional development for elementary school principals should be grounded in self-determined, experience-based, and reflective learning. The proposed model highlights principals’ agency, lifelong learning, professional interaction, and technology-enabled learning as central drivers of sustainable professional growth. The model provides a comprehensive framework for redesigning professional development policies and practices and contributes to improving educational leadership effectiveness and overall school performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Rožman M, Tominc P, Štrukelj T. Competitiveness through Development of Strategic Talent Management and Agile Management Ecosystems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. 2023;24(3):373-93. doi: 10.1007/s40171-023-00344-1.

2. Cheng B, Yu X, Dong Y, Zhong C. Promoting Employee Career Growth: The Benefits of Sustainable Human Resource Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2024;62(1):e12371. doi: 10.1111/1744-7941.12371.

3. Riesner S, Altnau C, Berner MR, Skraba A, Ajiri D, Kopac L. Employee Training as a Support for the Professional Development of the Company. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review. 2025;5(3):e05401. doi: 10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n03.pe05401.

4. Grynova M, Kononets N, Zhamardiy V, Grynyov R, Anushkevych V, Khomenko L, et al. Model of Professional Development of Future Managers in Master's Training System. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională. 2025;17(2):569-88. doi: 10.18662/rrem/17.2/996.

5. Amemasor SK, Oppong SO, Ghansah B, Benuwa BB, Essel DD. A Systematic Review on the Impact of Teacher Professional Development on Digital Instructional Integration and Teaching Practices. Frontiers in Education. 2025;10:1541031. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031.

6. Rahimi F. The Relationship between Teachers' Satisfaction with In-Service Training and Job Performance with the Mediation of Teachers' Professional Development in Baharestan District. A New Approach in Educational Sciences. 2021;4(1):51-62.

7. Nadali F, Sharafaei S, Heidari S. Investigating the Effect of Teachers' Professional Development Programs on Improving Their Teaching Skills in Schools. Strategic Research in Education and Training. 2025;56(23):47-69.

8. He P, Guo F, Abazie GA. School Principals' Instructional Leadership as a Predictor of Teachers' Professional Development. Asian Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 2024;9:63. doi: 10.1186/s40862-024-00290-0.

9. Mullen CA, Hall RB. Professional Development Supporting Principals' Changing Roles as Equity-Oriented Leaders. 2024.

10. Roshan-Ghias A, Oderon M, Akbari M. Examining the Relationship between Professional Development and School-Based Management from the Perspective of Elementary School Principals in Eastern Mazandaran. Strategic Research in Education and Training. 2025(43):31-43.

11. Yousefi A, Maleki-Avarsin S, Talebi B. Designing a Professional Development Model for Elementary School Principals in the 2025 Horizon Using a Grounded Theory-Based Approach. Management of Organizational Education. 2020;9(1):13-51.

12. Badri M, Rahimian H, Taheri M, Abbaspour A. Designing a Model of Individual Development Programs for Elementary School Principals Using a Meta-Synthesis Approach. Applied Educational Leadership. 2022;3(3):49-68.

13. Ghasemi M, Zarei Z, Rasoulian L. Professional Development of School Principals: Dos and Don'ts. Strategic Research in Education and Training. 2023;1(6).

14. Barati H. Identifying Factors Affecting the Professional Development of School Principals Using a Futures Studies Approach. Education and Human Resource Development. 2022;9(32):156-74.

15. Sahranavard Nashtifani Y, Ebrahimi S, Gholami B, Mouloudi S. Designing a Professional Development Model for Managers Using a Grounded Theory Approach: A Qualitative Study in Education. Education and Human Resource Development. 2023;10(39):39-78.

16. Deljou H, Sattari S, Soleimani T. Analyzing the Challenges and Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence in the Educational System with Emphasis on Teachers' Professional Development. Qualitative Research in Educational Sciences. 2025;263:135-60.

17. Mohagheghian S, Nadi M, Karimi F. Identifying Themes of Professional Development of Training Managers in Industrial Organizations with Emphasis on Digital Culture. Modern Management Engineering. 2025;4(10):238-58.

18. Nadi S, Nadi MA, Karimi F. Construction and Validation of a Professional Development Inventory for Training Managers Based on Digital Culture. Modern Management Engineering. 2025;4(11):95-136.

19. Fathabadi M, Eshghi A, Ghaderi Mansourieh F, Ghaderi Mansourieh F, editors. Elementary Teacher 2025: Professional Development Pathways for Adapting to Changes in the World of Education. Fifth International Conference on Management, Teaching, and Educational Research in Education; 2025; Tehran.

20. Hase S, Blaschke LM. Heutagogy and Work: Unleashing the Power of Learner Agency2021.

21. Hase S, Blaschke LM. Heutagogy, Work and Lifelong Learning. The SAGE Handbook of Learning and Work2022.

22. Kumar K. Heutagogy: An Effective Self-Determined Approach for Teachers' Continuous Professional Development. 2020.

23. Verma V. Heutagogical Learning in Professional Development: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education. 2025;14(3):81-108. doi: 10.32674/tvdrc668.

24. Knapke JM. Andragogy in Practice: Applying a Theoretical Framework to Team Science Training Workshops. 2024. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2024.12651.

25. Kirkgoz Y. Exploring the Potential of an Andragogical Approach to Teaching Leadership. 2023.

26. Alex JK, Mukuka A. Heutagogy in Action: Unveiling the Transformative Power of Virtual Air Campus Experiences of Mathematics Trainee Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2024;20(3):em2416. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/14320.

27. Imsiyah N, Sintiawati N, Purnamawati F, Himmah IF. Heutagogy Based Training Management: Self-Determined Learning for Adult Learners. Journal of Education and Community Empowerment. 2024;11(2):200-11. doi: 10.21831/jppm.v11i2.80507.

28. Sahlin S. Professional Development of School Principals: How Do Experienced School Leaders Make Sense of Their Professional Learning? Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2023. doi: 10.3102/1882674.

29. Abili K, Mazari A. Presenting a Self-Developmental Heutagogical Model in the Electronic Context: A Model for Learning Leadership. Encyclopedia of Digital Transformation. 2021;2(1):1-17.

30. Saeedavi K, Hosseinpour M, Barkat G. Identifying and Explaining Strategic Facilitating Factors of the Heutagogy Approach in Managers' Training. Jundishapur Journal of Education Development, Ahvaz. 2023;14:184-98.

31. Gholampour M, Mahmoudi Bourang M, Mohammadi Hosseini S. Requirements and Contexts of Employees' Self-Development Process in an Organization Based on the Educational Approach of Heutagogy: A Study of Elementary School Teachers. Education and Human Resource Development. 2025;44(12):118-43.

32. Khamri H, Faribarzi A, Naseri N. Designing an Empowerment Model with a Teacher Professional Development Approach. A New Approach in Educational Management. 2024;15(4).

33. Bufasi E, Cakane I, Greitans K, Dudareva I, Namsone D. Lesson Study as a Professional Development Model for Teaching Spatial Ability in Primary STEM. Education Sciences. 2024;14:512. doi: 10.3390/educsci14050512.

34. Spinello E, Corbett F. Connectivism and Leadership: Harnessing a Learning Theory for the Digital Age to Redefine Leadership in the Twenty-First Century. Heliyon. 2020;6(1):e03250. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03250.

Downloads

Published

1405-09-01

Submitted

1405-01-08

Revised

1405-03-17

Accepted

1405-03-26

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Ehsani, F. ., Shafizadeh, H., & Ahmadi, F. . (1405). Designing a Professional Development Model for Elementary School Principals with an Emphasis on the Heutagogy Approach. Journal of Study and Innovation in Education and Development, 1-26. https://jsied.org/index.php/jsied/article/view/532

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 295

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.